Article Two

The Second Amendment to the U. S. Constitution

“A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security
OF A FREE STATE,
THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”

The four lines above are the entire Second Amendment to the U. S. Bill of Rights. As written: There can be no INFRINGEMENT upon this right; not for any reason—that’s why the Amendment was written this way. To actually INFRINGE upon THE SECOND AMENDMENT is to

DECLARE WAR upon THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES.
There can be no other interpretation for any infringement
Yet that is exactly what is being planned-for
By those that want our freedom ended—completely!

“In addition to that we have the right, according to the U.S. Constitution to form Militias in this country. To serve and protect the land of the free, home of the brave… Because of president Obama there’s a lot of Americans worried about December 21st being the end of the world. Now I’m here to tell you it’s not going to be the end of the world but it will be the end of ‘American guns’ because this legislation through Executive Order is being worked through the White House and Washington and prepared for the American people, as we speak. This is a part of Obama’s Socialist Agenda. Not only did they go our and bailout the criminal banking institutions—the same ones that raped you in 2008 but now they’re taking away your gun rights so that they can fully disarm the American public before implementing a full scale police state…”  We must stop this NOW! (1)

“The shooting at Sandy Hook elementary last week has opened a dialogue into the psychology of the 2nd Amendment. The idea is bubbling to the surface that the US government must legislate away our right to protect ourselves with firearms because of a culture of violence or mental illness.

The National Institutes of Health claim that 1 in 4 adults are mentally ill which translates to 57.7 million Americans. According to the Public Health Law Research, restricting firearm ownership on people known or prone to mental illness would significantly reduce homicide and suicide rates. In the article individuals having been diagnosed with any form of depression or mental disorder defined by the psychiatric community would be excluded from the 2nd Amendment.

The pharmaceutical industry want to classify the right to keep and bear arms as a mental disorder in another power grab to circumvent and eventually destroy our Constitutional 2nd Amendment.

An estimated 260 to 300 million firearms are owned by American civilians which equals 1/3 of US households. While gun-related deaths are not raising according to police records, the fear-mongering continues as a supposed trend with no justification.

Propaganda studies into gun ownership claim that alcohol abuse causes the likelihood of gun-related violence to rise, according to Wintemute. Banning assault weapons would control the amount of rounds a person could shoot, while the police officers would still be allowed to tout automatic pistols. By restricting gun sales to include minor misdemeanors as well as convicted felons, 40% of gun sales would be curbed. And with the classification of gun support as a mental disorder, more control could be placed on who ultimately can own a gun.

Paul Barrett who has authored a book that coincidentally claims that current gun laws are ineffective and need to be stricter to prevent more deaths. Barrett says: “Criminologists have studied it, and the consensus is that those laws simply did not have a statistically meaningful effect on crime rates.” He also feels that the mainstream media focus on the shootings themselves ignore the actual problem which is actually a “social problem” which is subverted by “the overall gun homicide rate.”

In July of this year, Obama vowed to “curb violence in American cities, including reasonable restrictions on gun ownership.”  (2)

What happened at Sandy-Hook was designed in advance to create the atmosphere necessary to force the public (falsely) to demand gun-control while ignoring the other conditions that more than just contributed to this obscenity. There is a major criminal-crime that includes players from the shooting in Aurora, Colorado and Sandy-Hook: Possibly just so that two key people could escape testifying in the LIBOR trial.

What’s also at stake is: The Transcripts Expose Rate-Rigging at LIBOR, the Benchmark for Over $300 Trillion in Global Contracts. Two people got out of testifying. Could the use of their children in this way have been used to get them out of the LIBOR trials? These are the kinds of things that Israeli-agents delight in creating for their own ends – did it happen this time?

We’ve also totally lost control of our objectivity.

“Mind control. Mass hypnosis. Operant conditioning. Brain entrainment. That’s what we’re talking about here.

We’re so conditioned to how television covers life that we rarely step back and take notice.

In the case of massive disasters and crimes, network news rules the roost.

First, the premiere anchors, who are managing editors of their own broadcasts, give themselves the go signal. They will leave their comfortable chairs and travel to the scene of crime. “It’s that big.”

The anchors lend gravitas. Their mere presence lets the audience know this story trumps all other news of the moment. That’s the first hypnotic cue and suggestion.

Of course, the anchors were not in Newtown, Connecticut, as reporters. They weren’t there to dig up facts. Their physical presence at the Sandy Hook School and in the town was utterly irrelevant.

They could have been doing their newscasts from their studios in New York. Or from a broom closet.

But much better to be standing somewhere in Newtown. It imparts the sense of crisis to the viewing millions.

At the same time, the anchors are also there to give assurance. The subliminal message they transmit is: whatever has happened here is controllable.

The audience knows the anchors will provide the meaning and the official voice of the tragedy. The anchors are, in a way, priests, intoning their benediction to the suffering and their elegies to the dead.

This is what the audience expects, and this is what they get.

This expectation, in fact, is so deep that anything else would be considered an insult, a moral crime.

For example, suppose a network suddenly shifted gears and began interviewing police and residents and asking tough questions about contradictions in the official scenario. Suppose that became the primary focus. Suppose the tone became argumentative, in the interest of, God forbid, the truth.

In other words, in a jarring shift of perspective, the anchors began asking questions to seek answers. What a concept.

No, a priest doesn’t browbeat a parishioner. He takes confession and then offers a route to redemption.

But if, by some miracle, these anchors launched a quest for truth, the whole scene would devolve into uncertainty and even chaos.

“First, there was a man in the woods. You people chased him. You pinned him down and brought him back into town. Who is he? What’s his name? Where is he? Is he under questioning? What are you asking him? What gave you a clue that he might be a second shooter? Come on. Talk to us. People want to know. We aren’t going anywhere. We want some answers.”

This is called reporting, a foreign enterprise to these blown-dried kings and queens of media news.

“Sir, I know ABC definitively reported there was a second shooter. They said you gave them that information. Where did you get it?…No, I’m sorry, that’s not an answer, that’s a non-sequitur.”

Those of us reporting online declare there is something amiss when the second-shooter story is dropped like a hot potato…and we are called conspiracy theorists.

Get it? Trying to ask relevant questions becomes conspiracy only because the major media didn’t do their job in the first place.

“Sir, was it one gun found in trunk of the car or three? Show me the car. Yes. Let’s see it. I want to get the license plate. Excuse me? The car is what, some kind of state secret? I don’t think so. There are twenty dead children in that school over there, and we want to get to the bottom of this. Take me to the car.”

It’s called an investigation. Reporters do that.

Sir, your newspaper ran a story about a man’s body being found in Adam’s brother’s apartment. Then that became Adam’s mother found dead in her own house here in Newtown. What exactly happened there? A mistake? Wouldn’t you say that was a pretty big mistake? How did it happen? What’s that? Typical confusion in the early reporting of a crime? I don’t think so. Thinking a woman was a man and thinking he or she was found in New Jersey instead of Connecticut, that’s not typical at all. Did police find a man’s body. Speak up.”

Your typical American television viewer would cringe at such demanding questions. You know why? Because he has been entrained and conditioned by news anchors to refrain from digging below the surface. In other words, that viewer is hypnotized.

“Dr. Smith and Officer Jones, we understand that this boy, who was autistic, extremely shy, who had some sort of personality disorder, went into that school and methodically carried out the slaughter of twenty-seven people. In order for him to do that, he had to reload clips at least twice after the first clip ran out. Does that make sense? We’re not just talking about a violent outburst here, we’re talking about a methodical massacre. How do you explain that?”

If these anchors kept on asking questions like this, do you know what would happen? The viewing audience would begin to stir, would begin to break through their hypnotic programming and wake up.

“You know, he’s right. That doesn’t make sense. Maybe there really was a second shooter.”

“Or that Lanza kid…maybe he didn’t kill anybody at all.”

“What? You mean he was…set up?”

“Maybe he was a patsy.”

Yes. Instead of this kind of talk being consigned to “conspiracy nuts,” it actually becomes part of the evening news experience. Because reporters suddenly ask tough questions.

But no. We have to go with grief and shock. We have to lead with it and stay with it.

But that is an artificial construct. Yes, of course people in Newtown feel great shock and pain and loss and grief and horror, but the news producers are consciously moving minutes and hours of it through the tube and filtering out everything else.

They do this every time one of these events occurs, and so the audience expects it and soaks it in and, in that state of entrainment and hypnosis, the audience doesn’t want anything else…because anything else would BREAK THE FLOW and the spell, and the grief would no longer have the same impact.

Newtown is presented as a television event. From the outset, the mood is funereal. It has that tinge and coloration. The audience absorbs it and wants no intrusion on it.

This is Matrix programming.” There’s more at this link: (3).

“Any person who openly advocates for the overthrow of any part of the US Bill of Rights is guilty of constructive treason against the Republic and we the people. It is being said that the NRA is being silent on the Sandy Hook shooting and all of the talk in the mainstream is the NRA this and the NRA that with Bloomberg saying that the NRA doesn’t have the sway it once did.

Though we do intend to find out who killed 20 children and 4 adults at the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting as soon as law and order is restored in the United States, our number one concern right now is the Bolsheviks who have infiltrated our government and recently purchased 400 million rounds of .40 caliber hollow points for the purpose of murdering Americans.

If you think we are going to disarm in the smallest degree, you are truly delusional. The only ones who are waving your anti-gun flag are the same traitors who marched in your May Day parade. You are the few, we are the many.

What a world it would be if one could declare war and then just command his enemy to lay down his arms and acquiesce to slaughter. Dream on communists. You have your agents in the middle crying, “It’s futile to resist. Your guns are no match for their technology”, as your mainstream lapdogs betray your absolute well founded fear thereof. When you kill children you do unleash righteous indignation, but when you fail to shift the blame for the murder from yourselves to a patsy and then a gun, you aid in your destruction.

Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting – No sale, that is unless you are a gun distributer. …death to the international corporate mafia, we shall prevail.” (4)

On the practical side there is also this from a reader:

“Disarmament of the Americans?! I don’t think so. Just because no shots have been fired is no indication that American Patriots won’t fight back when the firearm round up goes awry. I assure all of you many patriots as myself will not submit to any attempts to confiscate our humble arsenals. There are millions of brave men out there that will fight back

With that said I wish to inform all of you of a movement called: “Pick 7.” The intent of Pick 7 is to muster millions of 7 man teams of warriors that will meet force with force should the government be hell bent on confiscating American’s weapons.

The irony is the government claims that it wants to save lives by banning assault rifles and millions will die resisting this out of control government’s attempt to take the guns. The government wants all of our firearms not just the semi-automatics.

Lets take a look at the government’s arsenal: Attack Drones, F35s, F22s, F18s, F16s, B1s, B2s, C130 Gunships, Apache Gunships, Navy Seals, Special Forces, Standing Army, Naval, and Marines Forces. Then there are the countless toys of destructions at their disposal and discretion.

So Pick 7 warriors that you can trust and rely on. Develop a plan and quietly train. Hone your skills and teach each what you know. The aforementioned weapons platforms are not foreign to the patriots. Many of you have been trained and operated those weapons of destruction and the government hates that fact.

Asking yourself when is it time to fight? You’ll know. Good day.”

No doubt this story is just beginning, and there are so few days left in this congressional-holiday to finish stealing the nation! Where will you come down on any of this?

Jim Kirwan

1) The Second Amendment is Under Attack!!! – 6 min 27 sec video

2) Tragic Shootings, Mental Illness and the Assault on the 2nd Amendment

3) How the Newtown massacre became a Mind-Control television event

4) Sandy Hook Communist False Flag Falling Apart at the Seams

 

Back to top

 

All images are © kirwan, all rights are reserved (unless otherwise noted).